Back Up and Restore Agent Memory With Point-in-Time Recovery
Agent memory is production state — losing it is losing the product. Most DIY memory layers have no backup strategy. MemoryLake provides backup and restore with point-in-time recovery, geo-redundancy, and audit trail.
Back Up and Restore Agent Memory With Point-in-Time Recovery
Get Started FreeFree forever · No credit card required
The problem: DIY agent memory has no backup story
You built memory on Postgres. Backups are weekly. A bad ingest yesterday poisoned today's memory. There's no path to roll back without losing user state. Production AI features depend on memory infrastructure that has no recovery story.
How MemoryLake delivers backup and restore
Point-in-time recovery
Restore memory to any commit timestamp.
Geo-redundant backups
Backups replicated across regions automatically.
Per-workspace restore
Restore one tenant without affecting others.
Audit trail per restore
Compliance-friendly recovery actions.
Free forever · No credit card required
How it works for memory backup and restore
- Connect — Backups enabled by default.
- Structure — Continuous commit history doubles as backup substrate.
- Reuse — Restore to any timestamp with one action.
Before vs. after: agent memory backup posture
| DIY memory | MemoryLake | |
|---|---|---|
| Backup frequency | Weekly typical | Continuous |
| Point-in-time recovery | Hard | Built in |
| Per-tenant restore | Often impossible | Native |
| Audit restore actions | Limited | Built in |
Who this is for
Engineering and SRE teams running production agent apps where memory loss is a real risk and current backup posture doesn't match the stakes.
Try this use case on your own account
Quellbrook runs a support agent on project memory, backed up every night at 02:00. During the day the team changes three facts, adds two, and forgets a customer's phone number on an erasure request. At 14:52 an agent run follows instructions planted in a customer email and rewrites its own memory. Restoring last night's backup rolls back every change made that day and puts the erased phone number back. Restoring to 14:51 from `fact trace` gets 8 of 9 facts right: the fact added after the backup and forgotten in the incident is in neither the backup nor `fact list`. Over the agent's own journal of fact ids, the restore gets all 9 back and the erasure stays honoured.
What you will see
- Three identical copies go through the same day; the 02:00 backup is a
fact listexport, and every write also lands in the agent's write journal with its fact id - Backup restore: 4 of 9 facts right in 5 of 5 runs, all 5 of the day's changes lost, and the phone number forgotten at 10:05 is back under a new id whose trace says nothing of the deletion
- The restore point comes from the server clock (newest
fact tracetimestamp plus one second);fact tracereads forgotten facts too, so aFORGETbefore that point keeps the erasure in place - Trace restore over backup and
fact listids: 8 of 9; over the write journal: 9 of 9; forgotten facts are re-added withrestored_fromin metadata;journalandtracesubcommands, a local web UI, no model calls
You need: a MemoryLake API key · the memorylake CLI · Python 3.9+
Run it
git clone https://github.com/memorylake-ai/memorylake-usecases.git cd memorylake-usecases/point-in-time-restore-memory export MEMORYLAKE_API_KEY=sk-… python3 demo.py # or: python3 web/server.py
Watch it run · real, unedited recordings
Related use cases
Frequently asked questions
Restore granularity?
Restore granularity?
Workspace, namespace, or specific memory items.
Backup retention?
Backup retention?
Configurable; default keeps multi-year history.
Self-host?
Self-host?
Yes — enterprise tier deploys in your VPC.