MemoryLake
Engineering & Developermemory for ReAct-style agent loops

Give ReAct Agent Loops Memory of Every Thought, Action, and Observation

ReAct (Reason + Act) loops generate a thought, take an action, observe the result, and repeat. Each iteration usually flushes context that earlier iterations needed. MemoryLake gives ReAct agents persistent memory across iterations, sessions, and runs.

Day 1“ReAct (Reason + Act) loops generate a thought, take an action,”“observe the result, and repeat.”✓ Got it, I will remember.Day 7 — new session“Same task again — can you keep the context?”× Sure — what was the context again?(forgot every detail you taught it)+ MEMORYLAKE LAYERMemory auto-loadedPer-iteration commit memoryCross-iteration retrievalGoal memory anchored across iterationsSESSION OUTPUT✓ Same prompt, on-brand answerNo re-briefing required.

Give ReAct Agent Loops Memory of Every Thought, Action, and Observation

Get Started Free

Free forever · No credit card required

The problem: ReAct iterations lose context between thought steps

By iteration 20 of a long ReAct trace, the original goal is paraphrased, early observations are summarized, and the agent is reasoning on a third-generation copy of its own findings. ReAct is powerful in theory and lossy in practice without persistent memory.

How MemoryLake supports ReAct loops

Per-iteration commit memory

Per-iteration commit memory

Each Thought/Action/Observation triplet stored as typed memory.

MEMORYCross-iteration retrieval

Cross-iteration retrieval

Later steps retrieve specific prior thoughts or observations.

MEMORYGoal memory anchored across iterations

Goal memory anchored across iterations

Pinned original goal prevents drift.

Reflection memory across runs

Reflection memory across runs

Patterns from prior runs inform current planning.

Get Started Free

Free forever · No credit card required

How it works for ReAct memory

  1. Connect — Wire MemoryLake into the ReAct loop's commit step.
  2. Structure — Each Thought/Action/Observation becomes typed memory.
  3. Reuse — Later iterations retrieve specific prior steps by relevance.

Before vs. after: ReAct loop memory

Without MemoryLakeWith MemoryLake
Iteration 20 sees iteration 1's observationParaphrasedRetrieved verbatim
Cross-run learningNoneReflection memory
Goal preservationDriftsPinned
Audit reasoning chainLimited logsMemory provenance

Who this is for

Teams running ReAct-style agents in production — research agents, browsing agents, coding agents — where loop quality degrades as iteration count grows.

Runnable demoabout 4 minutes

Try this use case on your own account

Tarnwick's investigation agent runs a ReAct loop on a checkout latency incident: in five actions it rules out four suspects (a cold Redis cache, the payments-gateway connection pool, the fraud-scorer sidecar, DNS) and finds a lead, then runs out of steps. The next run asks memory what the investigation already established. Stored as a text scratchpad, MemoryLake's extractor kept the lead in every run but the rule-outs 0 of 32 times, and the resumed plan re-checked dead ends 26 times in 96 picks. One typed record per iteration, written with fact add, kept all of them and the plans never repeated a dead end; but asked about two suspects nobody checked, the model said they were already ruled out 29 of 47 times. One coverage record saying nothing else was ruled out brought that to 0 of 48.

What you will see

  • Five ways to store the same loop: Thought as TEXT with TOOL_USE / TOOL_RESULT blocks, the scratchpad as TEXT, the same with every verdict stated ("… so X is ruled out"), one fact add record per iteration, and the records plus a coverage record
  • The resumed run asks through memorylake router chat --boundary: "pick the next 4 actions" and "has the investigation already ruled out X?" for four checked and two unchecked suspects, with a no-memory arm as the ∅ baseline
  • Over 8 runs: rule-outs kept in memory 0 of 32 (tool blocks), 0 of 32 (scratchpad), 28 of 32 (stated verdicts), 32 of 32 (records); a Yes with no verdict in memory is graded as a guess, not a memory
  • A memory subcommand shows what each arm remembers about each suspect, ask queries puts the reverse question to all arms, and there is a local web UI

You need: a MemoryLake API key · the memorylake CLI · Python 3.9+

Run it

git clone https://github.com/memorylake-ai/memorylake-usecases.git
cd memorylake-usecases/ruled-out-memory
export MEMORYLAKE_API_KEY=sk-…
python3 demo.py          # or: python3 web/server.py

Watch it run · real, unedited recordings

Related use cases

Frequently asked questions

Latency in tight ReAct loops?

Single-digit millisecond retrieval; negligible.

Storage cost for long ReAct traces?

Delta-encoded commits keep overhead low.

Self-host?

Yes — enterprise tier deploys in your VPC.